Thursday
March, 14 2013
MA 211K
2:00 p.m.
AGENDA SETTING
1. Approval of the minutes from February 14, 2013 meeting.
2.
Voting Results for 2013-2014 Executive Committee
Serving on next year's Executive
Committee:
Eric Amsel, S&BS; Jim Turner, B&E; Alicia
Giralt, A&H; Kathleen Herndon, A&H; Kirk Hagen, COAST; Ed Hahn, LIB; Patti Cost,
ED; Carol Naylor, HP, John
Armstrong, Science.
Action Items
3. ASSA
- Kristin Nelson, Chair
PPM 4-1A Awarding of Degrees
or Certificates Posthumously
PPM4-1A Recommendation
PPM 6-22 Student Code
Charge 3 Recommendation
PPM 6-3 Registration Dates and
Deadlines: Appointments, Add, Cancel, and Withdrawal
4.
Appointment, Promotion, Academic Freedom, and Tenure
Committee, Chris Eisenbarth, Chair
Goddard School of Business & Economics –
Post-Tenure Review Policy
Charge 4 – PPM1-17 Evaluation of Academic Deans -
Recommendation
5. Curriculum – Jim Wilson
BUSINESS & ECONOMICS – Business Administration
ENTR1001 Principles of
Entrepreneurship – New Course proposal
ENTR1002 Introduction to Entrepreneurship – New
Course proposal
ENTR1003 Ideation and Customer Development – New
Course proposal
ENTR1004 Entrepreneurial Finance – New Course proposal
ENTR2001 Sales & Marketing: Scaling a successful Business Model – New Course
proposal
Syllabus
ENTR3002 Starting the Business – New Course proposal
ENTR3003 Growing the Business - New Course proposal
Syllabus
EDUCATION – Child & Family Studies
Early Childhood Education - Program Change
CHF4990 Course Change
COAST –
Computer Science
Mobile application Development Institutional Certificate
- New Program
CS2400 Project Management – New Course Proposal
SOCIAL & BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE - Sociology
HEALTH PROMOTIONS – Respiratory Therapy
Masters of Respiratory Therapy
– New Program
MSRT6010 Medical Writing, Research
Methods & Design - New Course Proposal
MSRT6020 Medical
Pathophysiology/Cardiopulmonary Case Reviews - New Course Proposal
MSRT6030 Adult Learning Theory &
Simulation Strategies - New Course Proposal
MSRT6140 Applied Research in
Respiratory Care - New Course Proposal
MSRT6410 Certified Pulmonary
Function Technologist - New Course Proposal
MSRT6420 Sleep
Disorder Specialty - New Course Proposal
MSRT6460 Neonatal Pediatric
Specialty - New Course Proposal
MSRT6470 Adult Critical Care
Specialty - New Course Proposal
MSRT6480 Asthma Educator - New
Course Proposal
MSRT6700 Capstone Project - New
Course Proposal
MSRT6000 Health Systems and
Healthcare Economics- New Course Proposal
MSRT6100 Leading and Managing
People in Healthcare- New Course Proposal
MSRT6240 Human Resource Management
in Healthcare- New Course Proposal
MSRT6440 Medical Ethics and Law-
New Course Proposal
MSRT6050 Curriculum Design,
Evaluation & Assessment- New Course Proposal
MSRT6080 Conducting Educational
Research- New Course Proposal
MSRT6230 Instructional Technology
for Teachers- New Course Proposal
6. APAFT
Charge PPM 8-26 Advance Notice of Termination – Brian Rague, Chair
Recommend a charge to APAFT on what constitutes advance notice of termination.
PPM8-26
7. CRAO – Faculty Senate Representation in LEAP – Tim
Herzog, Chair, CRAO
8. Other Items
Institutional Credit Hour
Policy, Brian Rague, Chair
Faculty Governance Award Nominations
Next Meeting: Faculty Senate, March 21, 2013 at 3:00 pm WB 206-207
Thursday
March 14, 2013
MA211K
Approved
EXECUTIVE
COMMITTEE
Agenda
Setting Meeting Minutes
PRESENT
PRESENT: John Armstrong, Patti Cost, Shelly Costley, Ed Hahn, Kathy
Herndon, Tom Mathews, Ryan Pace, Brian Rague, Mike Vaughan, Vikki Vickers, Chuck
Wight, Brenda Stockberger, Secretary
GUESTS:
Kristin Nelson, Chris Eisenbarth, Jim Wilson, Tim Herzog, Jeff Steagall,
Cliff Nowell
Vel Casler, Carl Grunander
1.
Approval of the minutes from February 14, 2013 meeting.
MINUTES
Vikki Vickers moved to approve the minutes from the February 14, 2013
meeting.
SECOND
Patti Cost.
OUTCOME
Motion Carried.
Information
Items
2. Voting Results for 2013-2014
Executive Committee
Action
Items
3.
ASSA - Kristin Nelson, Chair
PPM 4-1A Awarding of Degrees or Certificates Posthumously
Policy 4-1A
AWARDING OF DEGREES OR CERTIFICATES POSTHUMOUSLY
RECOMMENDATION FROM ASSA
COMMITTEE 3-12-13
I. POLICY
Degrees or certificates
may be awarded to students who die or are near death due to illness or accident
while progressing satisfactorily toward the completion of a certificate or
degree program. The student should have completed approximately seventy-five
percent (75%) of the total credits required for that degree or certificate.
The type of
degree or certificate awarded will be based on the declared major.
II. PROCEDURE
A. Request(s) for such
degrees or certificates, along with appropriate documentation and rationale,
shall be approved by the appropriate Dean and Department Chair granting the
degree, then directed to the Registrar.
B. The posthumous degree
or certificate shall be noted appropriately in the next Commencement program.
DISCUSSION
Students may be awarded a degree whether they have a declared major or not.
Are
there a lot of request for these?
If student does have a declared major, they would be awarded that degree.
There were enough situations to warrant this charge.
MOTION
Shelley Costley made the motion to move PPM 4-1A Awarding of Degrees or
Certificates Posthumously forward to
Faculty Senate as recommended by the
ASSA committee.
SECOND
Ed Hahn
OUTCOME
Motion Carried.
PPM 6-22 Student Code
PPM 6-22
Hearing Process for Academic Colleges - DRAFT
(Updated January 18, 2013)
(insert into…. PPM 6-22 STUDENT CODE)
VIII. JURISDICTION
A. Procedures which foster
dialogue and promote resolution between the immediate parties involved in a
dispute are encouraged. Every effort should be made to resolve disputes at the
lowest possible level (i.e., individual, supervisor, department chairperson,
program director, and/or dean). If resolution by these means is unsatisfactory,
formal departmental or school procedures, if available, should be instituted
and/or the office designated by the Vice President for Student Affairs should be
notified. Students are also encouraged to contact their elected WSUSA
representatives, if desired.
B. Procedures and hearings
of all Weber State University bodies which have the potential of sanctioning
students or providing relief to students will follow guidelines specified in the
Student Code. Actions which seek redress from or imposition of sanctions on
staff/faculty members of Weber State University and/or its administrative
entities will follow guidelines and procedures outlined in the Weber State
University PPM.
C. Issues relating to
admission, residence halls, academic requirements, eligibility, residency, or
parking violations are deferred to University venues especially designated to
handle such issues, and appeals from those bodies will be considered only as
outlined in section IX.
D. Scope:
1. In the absence of
specific guidelines and procedures indicated elsewhere in the PPM, the due
process provisions contained in the Student Code shall be followed.
2. Financial and business
obligations such as payment of tuition, parking fees, residence hall charges,
financial aid, etc., are considered business transactions and are covered by
legal agreements in addition to the Student Code.
3. Generally, University
jurisdiction and discipline shall be limited to conduct which occurs on
University premises or which adversely affects the University community and/or
the pursuit of its objectives.
E. Specific Issues
In order to promote the
resolution of disputes in an efficient and effective manner, the power to
resolve particular issues shall be exercised as follows:
1. Academic Issues
a. Academic Dishonesty
i) All members of the
University community have the obligation to report instances of academic
dishonesty to the responsible faculty member.
ii) Grievances pertaining
to academic dishonesty shall be referred to the college in which they arise for
resolution according to the provisions of the Student Code.
procedures for student
petitions listed below in VIII.E.1.d.
b. Academic Grade/Course
Sanctions
Grievances regarding
grading or the imposition of course sanctions not involving academic dishonesty
shall be referred to the college in which they arise for resolution according to
the provisions of the Student Code.
procedures for student
petitions listed below in VIII.E.1.d.
c. Admission/Standing in
Restricted Enrollment Programs
Grievances regarding
admission to or standing in a restricted enrollment program at the University
shall be referred to the college in which they arise for resolution according to
the provisions of the Student Code.
procedures for student
petitions listed below in VIII.E.1.d.
d. Procedures for Student Petitions
for Academic Grievances
Whenever possible, complaints or grievances should be resolved at the lowest
level possible (i.e. faculty member, staff member, director, etc.).
Students with unresolved academic issues can invoke the following levels
in petitioning their cases.
Individuals must submit their petition within four (4) months after the event or
issue being contested. Time frames
may be waived to accommodate extraordinary circumstances.
A student’s petition must contain a statement of the relief sought
(desired outcome) and a short account of the facts, reasons, and rationale to
support the desired outcome.
The petition levels are sequential and students must exhaust their options at
one level before proceeding to the next unless there are unusual or extenuating
circumstances that warrant a petition going directly to the College Hearing
Committee. The College Dean will
make this determination.
Petition Level 1:
Petition the College Department Chair (or Department Committee if
applicable). The Chair or Department Committee will determine how to proceed
and shall attempt to resolve the issue(s) within a reasonable time period.
Once a decision has been reached, the department chair (or Committee
Chair) will make a good faith effort to respond in writing to the student within
10 business days with a copy of the letter sent to the college dean.
If a satisfactory resolution cannot be found, the student may petition
the college dean.
Petition Level 2:
Petition the College Dean.
The Dean shall attempt to resolve the issue(s) within a reasonable time period.
Once a decision has been reached, the college dean will make a good faith effort
to respond in writing to the student within 10 business days with a copy of the
letter sent to the department chair.
If a satisfactory resolution cannot be found, the student may petition the
College Hearing Committee.
Petition Level 3:
Petition the College Hearing Committee.
The petitioning student has the opportunity to meet in-person and present his or
her case to the College Hearing Committee.
The student may also be accompanied by an advisor at his or her expense
(this person is advisory only). The
committee shall meet to render a decision within a reasonable time period.
A written summary of the significant assertions and findings of the
hearing shall be kept. Decisions of
the committee must be in writing and should give the basis for the decision.
The committee will make a good faith effort to respond in writing to the
student within 10 business days with a copy of the letter sent to the college
dean. There are no appeals beyond
the College Hearing Committee other than due process violations.
(NOTE: Every college must have a
five-member hearing committee appointed by the Dean consisting of at least one
student and four other members of the University community from the respective
college with one person acting as chair - see PPM 6-22.XI.A.1).
Petition Level 4:
Meet with the University Due Process Officer on claims of substantive or
procedural due process violation(s). The Due Process Officer can rule only on
due process issues and shall render a decision and communicate it in writing to
the student with copies to the College Dean and College Hearing Committee.
The Due Process Officer may take the following actions:
a. Affirm the decision of the College Hearing Committee;
b. Direct the College Hearing Committee to reopen the hearing for a particular
purpose in order to safeguard due process;
c. Remand the case to the College Hearing Committee for a new hearing after
consultation with University Legal Counsel in order to safeguard due process.
(Note: The Due Process Officer serves as a resource
for advice/guidance to administrators, faculty, staff and students on the
petition process).
2. Administrative Issues
Decisions on all issues of
an administrative nature, such as admission to the University, residency,
tuition, course waivers, credit adjustment, graduation, program eligibility,
participation in specific activities, financial aid, parking and traffic, and
residence halls, will be resolved based on the procedures outlined in section
IX.
3. Behavioral Issues
Unless otherwise specified
herein, behavioral issues involving the alleged violation of the Student Code
shall be referred to the Dean of Students for resolution according to the
provisions hereof.
4. Student Grievances
Against Faculty
Grievances against an
individual faculty member on grounds other than grading, course sanctions,
academic dishonesty, or admission/standing in restricted enrollment programs
shall be referred to the appropriate department chair, dean, vice president, or
other responsible administrator for resolution according to the
5. Student Grievances Against Staff/Administration
6. Off-Campus Behavior
Off-campus behavior by
students or student groups acting as official representatives of the University
or utilizing the name of the University in any capacity or by students or
student groups charged with any violent crime may be referred by any interested
party to the Dean of Students for review. If the behavior is in violation of the
provisions of the Student Code and may endanger the safety or welfare of the
University community, University action may be taken and sanctions may be
imposed.
7. Criminal Activity/Civil Court Actions
a. The jurisdiction of federal, state, and local
courts and law enforcement officials is recognized by the University with regard
to criminal offenses and civil matters.
i) Courts have jurisdiction over cases involving
violations of civil and criminal law.
ii) Weber State University has jurisdiction over
violations of University rules and regulations.
b. When an act allegedly violates both civil or
criminal law and University rules, there is concurrent jurisdiction.
c. University Police have the responsibility to
investigate criminal acts and enforce court orders as mandated by the
requirements of their duly constituted offices.
8. Referral Power
Issues that exceed the jurisdictional scope of a
particular hearing committee shall be referred to the Due Process Officer for
reassignment to the appropriate committee.
DISCUSSION
What to do when petitions if the Dean’s were teaching a class that a student was
enrolled in. How can a student submit a complaint when the Dean’s input is
needed on the petition.
Time freames wmay be waived to accommodate extraordinary circumstances. Unless
it is the Dean that the complaint is about.
MOTION
Ed Hahn
SECOND
Tom Mathews
OUTCOME
Motion Carried.
PPM
6-3 Registration Dates and Deadlines: Appointments, Add, Cancel, and Withdrawal
Charge: Review PPM 6-3 and
make recommendations concerning
Students who stop attending class
Registration Dates and Deadlines: Appointments, Add, Cancel, and Withdrawal
No. 6-3
Rev. 05-01-12
Date: 4-20-77
Without special permission, students may withdraw from an individual course from
the 16th business day of a semester or block through the 50th business day of a
semester or 30th business day of a block.
A "W" grade will appear on the transcripts of students who withdraw from
individual courses. Students may not
withdraw from individual courses during the remaining semester or block.
A.
Students who stop
attending a class without officially withdrawing will receive a "UW" (Unofficial
Withdrawal) for that class. The
procedure and deadlines for making registration changes are published each term
in the class schedule.
B.
Unless
receiving prior approval from the instructor, students who do not attend the
first two class periods or 5% of the course after enrolling in the course, may
be dropped by the instructor within two business days. Students are
dropped by the instructor notifying the Registrar's Office. If the
instructor does not drop the student from the course and the student does not
plan to attend, the responsibility to drop lies on the student.
B.
C.
Refund of tuition and fees will be based on the refund policy of the
institution.
Students may withdraw completely from all courses for which they have registered
through the 50th business day of the semester or 30th day of a block.
Thereafter, students may appeal in cases of compelling, non-academic
emergencies by submitting a petition and
supporting documentation to the Registrar's Office.
Appeals may be submitted until the last day of regular class instruction
proceeding the final examination period.
a.
A
withdrawal form must be obtained from the Registration Office, completed in
accordance with the instructions, and then submitted to the Registration Office.
b.
The
student’s record will reflect only the statement "Registered and Withdrew" and
the date.
c.
Refund
of tuition and fees will be based on the refund policy of the institution.
VI.
ADMINISTRATIVE DROPS AND WITHDDRAWALS
a.
Failing to meet pre-requisite requirements:
A department or instructor may drop an enrolled student from their course
if a student fails to meet the established pre-requisite rules for the course.
The department or instructor must contact the Registrar’s Office in
writing before the first day of the semester and request that the student be
removed from the course. The student
will be dropped from the course, the course will not be listed on their
transcript, and the student will not be charged tuition for the course.
b.
Non-Attendance: Unless receiving
prior approval from the instructor, a department or instructor may drop an
enrolled student from their course if a student fails to attend class during the
first two class periods or first five percent of the course as determined by the
instructor. To drop a non-attending
student, the department or instructor must contact the Registrar’s Office in
writing within two business days following that deadline and requests that the
student be removed from the course.
The student will be dropped from the course, the course will not be listed on
their transcript, and the student will not be charged tuition for the course.
If the department or instructor does not drop a student from a course and
the student does not plan to attend, the responsibility to cancel or withdraw
remains with the student.
c.
Recommendations for withdrawal based on academic dishonesty or behavioral
problems: Consistent with PPM 6-22
Student Code, grievances regarding academic dishonesty shall be referred to the
college in which they arise for resolution according to the provisions of the
Student Code. Behavioral issues
shall be referred to the Dean of Students for resolution according to the
provisions of the Student Code.
DISCUSSION
This section was dealing when a student stops attending classes during a
semester.
Mark Simpson, Registrar, helped draft the bottom section.
Registration supports this recommendation.
MOTION
Kathy Herndon motioned to move PPM6-3 forward to Faculty Senate with
recommendations from the ASSA
committee.
SECOND
Patti Cost
OUTCOME
Motion Carried.
4. Appointment, Promotion,
Academic Freedom, and Tenure Committee, Chris Eisenbarth, Chair
Goddard
School of Business & Economics –
Post-Tenure Review Policy
(Available for viewing on
the Faculty Senate Website
http://weber.edu/facultysenate/default.html click on the March 14, 2013
Agenda, Item 4)
DISCUSSION
APAFT committee approved this document with only minor style changes with
hyphens.
Tenure document was revised three years ago, so there was no need to revise it.
Tenure documents are approved after the vote at Faculty Senate.
MOTION
Ryan Pace moved to forward the
Goddard School
of Business & Economics – Post-Tenure Review Policy to the Faculty Senate.
SECOND
Shelly Costley
OUTCOME
Motion Carried.
Charge 4 –
PPM1-17 Evaluation of Academic Deans – Recommendation
(Available for viewing on
the Faculty Senate Website
http://weber.edu/facultysenate/default.html click on the March 14, 2013
Agenda, Item 4)
DISCUSSION
Section A
updated to specify the process and timeline.
Give Dean’s the opportunity to submit a status report on their college.
Section B to correct the
title of the survey to read Dean’s Leadership and Management Evaluation
survey.
Section C – Removed the
hard copy
The wording formally
evaluated by the provost every two years sounds confusing.
Changes the term length
to 24 months.
It sounds like the Deans
will be on record and evaluated at the end of the second year.
Currently information is
gathered at two years with a formal evaluation at the end of the 4th
year.
Information was gathered
every two years and rolled into the 4 year evaluation.
This sound like it may
inhibit recruitment if this language is used.
Input before the end of
four years.
Sounds like a formal
evaluation every two years as it is now written.
Reviewed at 3 and 6
Survey instrument –
should this dean be reappointed. Why
is it on the survey if it has no meaning
Provide a greater voice
for faculty input for an interim evaluation
No conversation about the
impact of recruitment.
Correct the course if
progress isn’t satisfactory.
Safeguard Dean and
empower faculty.
Can a review be requested
if one wasn’t scheduled?
Language that says
interim instead of every two years.
Changes to policy erases
the distinction between an interim review and a full review.
“Interim two-year” rather
than every 2 years.
Recommend in Section A to
remove ‘formally’ and ‘every’ in the first sentence
MOTION
Vicki Vickers motioned to return PPM
1-17 to the APAFT committee with
recommendations listed.
SECOND
Shelly Costley
OUTCOME
Motion Carried.
Action Items
7. Curriculum – Jim
Wilson, Chair, Curriculum Committee
BUSINESS & ECONOMICS –
Business Administration
Minor in
Entrepreneurship - New Program
ENTR1001 Principles of Entrepreneurship – New Course proposal
ENTR1002 Introduction to Entrepreneurship
– New Course proposal
ENTR1003 Ideation and Customer Development
– New Course proposal
ENTR1004 Entrepreneurial Finance – New
Course proposal
ENTR3002 Starting the Business – New
Course proposal
ENTR3003 Growing the Business - New Course
proposal
Course pulled for further
discussion:
ENTR2001
Sales & Marketing: Scaling a successful Business Model – New Course proposal
DISCUSSION
Vel Casler & Carl Grunander from the Sales and Service Technology
Department voiced concerns on the
new course ENTR2001 title “Sales & Marketing: Scaling a Successful Business
Model”.
Jeff Steagall and Cliff Nowell from School of Business and Economics.
SST
Department is in support of this new minor.
Is asking to change the name of the course to
“Entrepreneurship Marketing: Scaling
a Successful Business Model”.
Would like to settle this quickly as opposed to sending back to Curriculum
Committee.
The
School of Business doesn’t think removing sales from the title will describe the
coursework involved in the course.
This course would work nicely with the Sales Center.
SST
would like to work together with the Business School in the spirit of
cooperation to have students from
both disciplines take classes and complement the available degrees in both
Colleges.
Will Business be adding new courses with “sales” in the title?
Would you be willing to have students take a course from the SST department that
could satisfy one of your degree
requirements in the future?
SST
would welcome students from the school of Business to earn a minor in Sales,
likewise, wewould encourage our students to earn a minor from your school as
well.
The
Sales and Service Technology Department are withdrawing their objection with
this ENTR2001 course.
MOTION
Kathy Herndon moved to forward the new
Minor in
Entrepreneurship and its related courses to the Faculty Senate.
SECOND
Ed Hahn
OUTCOME
Motion Carried.
EDUCATION –
Child & Family Studies
Early
Childhood Education - Program Change
(Two proposals)
COAST – Computer Science
Mobile Application Development
Institutional Certificate – New Program
CS2400 Project Management – New Course
Proposal
SOCIAL & BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
- Sociology
SOC4220
Life in a Consumer Society – New Course proposal
SOC3540
Small Groups & Leadership, Deletion
SOC4120 Socialization Over the Life
Course, Deletion
DISCUSSION No discussion on these
Items.
OUTCOME Motion Carried.
HEALTH PROFESSIONS -
Respiratory Therapy
Masters of Respiratory Therapy
– New Program
MSRT6010 Medical Writing, Research Methods & Design - New Course Proposal
MSRT6020 Medical Pathophysiology/Cardiopulmonary Case Reviews - New Course
Proposal
MSRT6030 Adult Learning Theory & Simulation Strategies - New Course
Proposal
MSRT6130 Evidence-based Practice - New Course Proposal
MSRT6140 Applied Research in Respiratory Care - New Course Proposal
MSRT6410 Certified Pulmonary Function Technologist - New Course Proposal
MSRT6420 Sleep Disorder Specialty - New Course Proposal
MSRT6460 Neonatal Pediatric Specialty - New Course Proposal
MSRT6470 Adult Critical Care Specialty - New Course Proposal
MSRT6480 Asthma Educator - New Course Proposal
MSRT6700 Capstone Project - New Course Proposal
MSRT6000 Health Systems and Healthcare Economics- New Course Proposal
MSRT6100 Leading and Managing People in Healthcare- New Course Proposal
MSRT6240 Human Resource Management in Healthcare- New Course Proposal
MSRT6440 Medical Ethics and Law- New Course Proposal
MSRT6050 Curriculum Design, Evaluation & Assessment- New Course Proposal
MSRT6080 Conducting Educational Research- New Course Proposal
MSRT6230 Instructional Technology for Teachers- New Course Proposal
New Programs
must be approved by Trustees and Board of Regents.
Question why they made certain answers on Beneficial degree in that it would pull students from all over
the western states.
Open
to other undergraduate areas not specifically those with BS Respiratory degrees.
MOTION
Shelly Costley motioned to move the new Program of Masters in Respiratory
Therapy and its curriculum forward to Faculty Senate.
SECOND
Vikki Vickers
OUTCOME
Motion Carried.
Recommend a charge to APAFT on what constitutes an advance /conditional notice
of termination.
DISCUSSION
Charge to read: Review
and revise PPM8-26 to address situations in which a faculty member receives a
conditional termination. Does “advance
notice” as written in the policy cover cases in which the notice includes a
condition, e.g. “unless there is substantial improvement in your Service to the
University as detailed in your recent mid-tenure review, your appointment will
be discontinued twelve months from the date of this notice.”
If necessary, investigate legal interpretations of this policy with
University council.
MOTION
Brian Rague motioned to consider the Charge listed
SECOND
John Armstrong
OUTCOME
Motion Carried.
7. CRAO – Faculty Senate
Representation in LEAP – Tim Herzog, Chair, CRAO
Reviewed PPM1-C-I -- The General Faculty,
Section 1 Membership
Inserted some language to clarify the
policy.
Goal to say that faculty will only have
voting power and representation through an organizational unit.
Possible assign CE with another
organizational unit.
Concerned with getting curriculum through.
Organizational unit is a college or the
library.
8. Other Items
Charge Curriculum Committee to add this
policy to the Curriculum PPM in Section 5.
This will be
added to the next meeting of the Curriculum Committee March 20 for a
vote.
No
Discussion.
MOTION Shelly Costley motioned
to send this charge to the University Curriculum Committee
recommending that this policy be added to the Curriculum PPM in Section
5.
SECOND Patti Cost.
OUTCOME Motion Carried.
Kathleen Herndon nominated and approved as the awardee for 2012-13
Award
to be presented at the 18 April 2013 Faculty Senate meeting.