Thursday
22 August, 2013
Betty Lampros Board Room
2:00 p.m.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING
1.
Approval of the minutes from April 11,
2013 meeting.
2.
WSU Vision for 2013-14 - President Wight and Mike Vaughan
3. Faculty
Board of Review – Nominate new FBR Chair
4.
Meeting Schedule for 2013-14
Executive
Committee and Faculty Senate
Program
Review Schedule
5.
Committee Membership Changes
Curriculum Committee – Replace Jared Lisonbee who will be leaving WSU at the end of Fall Semester. Jennifer Ostrowski is being invited to be on the committee. Teaching & Learning Assessment - replace Raji Lauffer, COAST who has left WSU. Vincent Bates, ED has been approved by Executive Committee.
6.
Draft Committee Charges
-Academic
Resources and Computing – Kirk Hagen
-Admissions, Standards and Student Affair’s – Carol Naylor
-Appointment, Promotion, Academic Freedom and Tenure – James Turner
-Constitutional Review, Apportionment and Organization – Kathleen Herndon
-Curriculum
Committee – Ed Hahn
-Environmental Issues Committee – Alica Giralt
-General
Education Improvement and Assessment – Eric Amsel & Kathleen Herndon
-Honorary
Degree – Carol Naylor
-Research,
Scholarship and Professional Growth – John Armstrong
-Salary
Benefits, Budget and Fiscal Planning – Patti Cost
-Teaching,
Learning, and Assessment – Eric Amsel
7.
Other Items
Executive
Committee to be introduced at Faculty Senate in September.
Parliamentarian for Senate Meetings.
Executive Committee Meeting Minutes
Draft 9-9-2013
Thursday
August 22, 2013
Betty Lampros Board
Room
PRESENT
- Eric Amsel, John Armstrong, Patti Cost, Alicia Giralt,
Kirk Hagen, Ed Hahn, Kathy Herndon,
Carol Naylor, James Turner, Mike Vaughan, Chuck
Wight,
Brenda Stockberger
GUESTS
- Gail Niklason
1.
MINUTES – Approval of the minutes from Agenda Setting meeting - April
11, 2013.
MOTION
John Armstrong moved to approve the minutes from 11 April 2013.
SECOND
Ed Hahn
OUTCOME
Unanimous
2.
WSU Vision for 2013-14 – Chuck Wight and Mike Vaughan
President Wight
Has invited Faculty Chair and
Vice Chair to come to President’s Council.
Will come to Faculty Senate meetings to give a report to the Senate
on what is going on in other areas of Weber State as schedule permits.
Mike Vaughan
This year the number of faculty is the largest at 525.
Seventy new faculty have been
hired this year.
From the total hired last
year and this year, one out of five faculty is new.
Average age of faculty is 41.
About eight years older than the national average.
Capital Campaign will be announced in the near future.
Arts and Humanities are at the top
of their
funding goals.
There is an eighty percent probability that the current Social
Sciences building will be replaced with a
new building.
3.
Faculty Board of Review
Nominations for the Chair of the Faculty Board of Review are Molly
Smith and Jim Jacobs.
4.
Meeting Schedule for 2013-14
The Dates of Executive Committee meetings and Faculty Senate meetings
were handed out.
Schedule of Program Review meetings
were passed out--Sept 5, Sept
26, Oct 3, Nov 14.
Gail Niklason gave information on how many
Program Reviews are to be reviewed and what the Executive Committee needs to
look for in a Program Review.
All information will be available on
the Program Review Website.
5.
Committee Membership changes
Curriculum Committee – Jenn Ostrowski, ED will replace Jared Lisonbee, ED
who is leaving WSU.
Teaching, Learning and Assessment
- Vincent Bates, ED will replace Raji Lauffer, COAST who has
left WSU.
Motion to approve the membership changes in
Curriculum committee and Teaching, Learning and Assessment by Kathy Herndon
Second by Carol Naylor
Outcome
- Unanimous
6.
Draft Committee Charges
ARCC –
Academic Resources and Computing Charges 2013-14 –
Draft
Explanatory Note
The
chair of the ARCC committee stated that charges for 2013-2014 are unchanged from
the 2012-2013 charges. (See items 1
through 10 below). He also stated
that the ARCC committee has recently created criteria for the evaluation of
proposals. (See item 2 below).
The committee will fine tune this criteria during the 2013-2014 academic
year.
1.
Allocate ARCC resources, including Dee Family Technology Grant funds,
using consistent, objective, fair and reasonable criteria.
2.
Review funding criteria and procedures for ARCC for possible revision or
clarification.
Completed
3.
Continue to improve the means of submitting proposals and decreasing the
amount of paper work. Evaluate
opportunities for paperless work flows campus-wide.
3.
Assess faculty and student computer needs, solicit faculty input and
lobby for faculty
computer-related
interests.
4.
Examine product implementation in computer labs to determine if some
products could be used on a
campus-wide basis.
5.
Review (with computing support) standards and policies for hardware and
software purchases.
6.
Maintain close communication with other computer resource entities on
campus, including CE and IT
online instruction.
7.
Research ways to strengthen academic computing, specifically in the
areas of visualization, simulation and scientific analysis by exploring
opportunities on external grant support.
8.
Align ARCC process with the ITAC (Information Technology Advisory
Council) process.
9.
Investigate and report on the committee reorganizations in IT,
specifically the portfolio divisions and its
effect on faculty representation on IT committees.
2. Review and consider other
outdated PPM’s in Section 6 – Student Services.
3. Clarify the language in
PPM6-22, IV, D, 2, a. Cheating and b. Plagiarism.
4. Insert language to PPM
6-22, VIII, E, 1, d. Procedures for Student Petitions for Academic Grievances,
to allow for University legal counsel to take the lead in resolving sanctions
from outside entities.
5 Establish a timeline with
dates and directives for students wishing to file a complaint against a faculty
member (PPM 6-22 ).
APAFT -
Appointment, Promotion, Academic Freedom, And Tenure Charges 2013-14 -
Draft
1.
Review the post-tenure review documents of the four colleges whose post-tenure
review plans have yet to be approved.
(This should require at least two APAFT meetings in 2013.)
2.
Once all college post-tenure documents have been reviewed, the APAFT Committee
should provide recommendations to the Executive Committee and Provost regarding
future changes or needed clarifications for the University post-tenure review
policy (e.g., develop institutional policies for instances when a faculty member
fails to remediate identified deficiencies, etc.).
3.
In anticipation of the formation of a cross-disciplinary, university committee
to evaluate the use of electronic portfolios for promotion, tenure and review
documents, the APAFT Committee should investigate and provide a summary report
of the following items:
a.
the potential uses of electronic portfolios (e.g., promotion, tenure,
accreditation, etc.)
b.
the potential benefits of using electronic portfolios (e.g., easy to update,
backup to paper files, easier presentation of multimedia, etc.)
c.
potential pitfalls (e.g., privacy or security concerns, disadvantages for
non-technologically savvy faculty, etc.)
d.
if or how other institutions are using electronic portfolios
e.
possible platforms and vendors of software (e.g., homegrown versus commercial
software,
4.
Review and revise PPM8-26 to address situations in which a faculty member
receives a conditional termination. Does "advance notice" as written in the
policy cover cases in which the notice includes a condition, e.g. "unless there
is substantial improvement in your Service to the University as detailed in your
recent mid-tenure review, your appointment will be discontinued twelve months
from the date of this notice." If necessary, investigate the legal
interpretations of this policy with University Counsel.
CRAO –
Constitutional Review, Apportionment and Organization Charges 2013-14 –
Draft
1.
Calculate apportionment for Faculty Senate representation using the
Hamilton Method and present the
apportionment figures to the Faculty Senate during Fall Semester. (November
deadline).
2.
Continue to work on Apportionment Procedures document to deal with the
questions: ”Under what types of leave
would faculty be counted for apportionment?”
3.
Continue to work on the proposed changes to the PPM related to
representation of faculty outside of the “organizational units” defined in
section B-II as the Library and the Colleges.
4.
Possibly consider a modification to the ppm to more carefully define the
term organizational unit. Should the
colleges all be listed explicitly in the ppm?
should there be a broader and more inclusive definition of organizational
unit?
5.
Research questions and make recommendations that are brought to the
attention of the CRAO Committee. (Ongoing)
6.
Review PPM for nonsubstantive terminology changes such as department name
changes, etc. (Fall)
7.
Review PPM policies (20 years or older) to identify possible action.
(Time permitting)
CURR CMT
– Curriculum Committee Charges 2013-14 –
Draft
1.
Review and approve curriculum and program proposals
2.
Offer seminars to faculty (probably through TLA), to help acquaint
faculty with the curriculum process
3.
Discuss policy on communicating prerequisite changes affecting other
departments and to ensure that other
departments are aware of these changes
(left from previous year)
4.
Work with General Education Committee to revise curriculum approval forms
to reflect assessment criteria
EIC –
Environmental Issues Committee Charges 2013-14 –
Draft
2. Make a concerted effort to
find ways to better reach students with sustainability – related curricular
offerings.
3. Advertise and promote on
campus, review, and select projects for the 2013-2014 Student Sustainability
Research Awards, and the Faculty Sustainability Research Award.
EIC would like to shift the time of this process so that the awards could
be made publically at the Intermountain Sustainability Summit in the Spring
Semester.
4. Work to build a plan, with
partnerships across campus to reduce WSU’s commuting – related Scope 3
emissions. This will be an
important part of the revised Climate Action Plan.
Explore ideas for creating under Administrative Services and “Integrated
Transportation Management Group” that would help integrate discussions on public
transportation, bike commuting, motor vehicle commuting and parking.
Parking Services in the future will increasingly be part of any solution
to managing the number of cars coming to campus and also part of reducing the
overall WSU carbon footprint, and the EIC would like to encourage Parking
Services to begin considering how this office could play a role beyond assigning
permits, enforcing regulations and so forth.
5. Coordinate with the
Community Engagement Center for the 2013-14 Engaged Learning Series with the
theme “On Air” for films/speakers/panel events that the EIC can coordinate and
host or partner with the other departments and programs to host.
6. Connect with WSU faculty,
staff and students to the Utah Moms for Clean air group by establishing an Ogden
chapter. Connect WSU students to
the new Utah Students for Clean Air Group.
7. Help to implement the new
no-smoking zones and idle-free policies if approved this spring (2013) by
President’s Council and the Board of Trustees.
8. The EIC Chair will sit on
the Sustainability Fund Oversight Committee to determine next year’s Student
Intern as well as approve projects that utilize the $16,000 for the next year.
9. Continue to improve our
website and newsletter.
10. Work with the Teaching and Learning
Forum to bring sustainability awareness into their New Faculty Retreat and other
TLF sponsored events.
11. Work to partner with the Wellness
program (both student and staff) to include sustainability-related
components/information in their offerings and announcements.
12. Continue our general efforts to expand
partnerships across campus with the WSU Outdoor Program,
alumni, student
affairs, Community Engagement Center, student organizations, and in the broader
community (e.g. Ogden City)
to envision and implement sustainability-related initiatives.
GEN ED –
General Education Charges 2013-14 – Draft
1.
In consultation with WSU’s deans and department chairs, members of the
GEIAC will identify faculty members to
fill vacancies on the General Education Area Committees:
Composition; American Institutions, Quantitative Literacy; Computer &
Information Literacy; Humanities;
Creative Arts; Social Sciences; Physical Sciences; Life Sciences; Diversity.
(Ongoing)
2.
The GEIAC will guide the GE Area Committees as they systematically
collect and analyze assessment data and
make recommendations for the improvement of General Education
courses in their area.
Provide
training to the GE Area Committees in the proper collection, reporting, and
assessment of data collected and
– if requested by the college, department, or program -- provide training in
the proper collection, reporting, and assessment of data collected to
faculty teaching general education courses.
The GE Area Committees will provide a report
to the GEIAC on the data collected during the spring and summer 2013
semesters (due November 15, 2013).
The GEIAC will provide a summary report to the Faculty Senate in
March 20, 2014.
Provide and document interpretations and
clarifications as to the intent of the general education outcomes to
faculty.
HD –
Honorary Degree Charges 2013-14 – Draft
1.
Meet separately and early as the faculty portion of the committee to
discuss representing in a unified manner the constituent needs and interests of
the faculty in the deliberation of the larger committee.
2. Ensure
faculty involvement in the nomination and selection of candidates for honorary
degrees and for commencement
speakers through maintaining the important voice of the faculty and the
Faculty
Senate as a major force on the
institutional committee.
3. Consider
ways to encourage more nominations from faculty for honorary degrees.
4.
Encourage the selection of at least one honorary degree recipient each
year who has made an outstanding
academic contribution to higher education, preferably a retired WSU faculty
member or past faculty member who
has left Weber State University. Current faculty members are not eligible.
5. Work to
achieve a representation of gender and ethnicity among degree recipients and
ensure that all recipients are of stature to enhance the image of Weber State
University.
6.
See that the criteria for honorary degrees are considered, so that the
understandable desire of the
administration to cultivate donors and potential donors does not overwhelm the
deliberations and pass over
otherwise worthy candidates.
7.
Provide the larger committee with a way to carry forward information so
next year’s committee can benefit
from work done this year.
RSPG –
Research, Scholarship and Professional Growth Charges 2013-14 –
Draft
1.
Continue to issue requests for proposals (RFPs) for Research and
Instructional Improvement grants, and
Hemingway Vitality, Excellence and Collaborative awards, and review the
proposals in a timely manner.
2.
Continue to coordinate deadlines for submission of proposals with the
chairs of the
Institutional Review Board
and the Animal Care and Use Committee.
3.
Review and update as needed the proposal guidelines.
Clarify and report the criteria for awarding the
grant.
Explore ways to simplify the process and broaden the criteria.
4.
Provide feedback to authors why proposals were not funded.
5.
Continue efforts to publicize the committee’s activities. Seek ways to
broaden participation campus
wide including adjunct
faculty. Explore opportunities to disseminate information about the funded
projects, including
workshops, in order to provide consistent information and feedback to
potential
applicants.
6.
Work with the Teaching, Learning and Assessment Committee to find
non-monetary ways to promote and recognize faculty research and scholarship.
7.
Work with the Teaching, Learning and Assessment Committee to help faculty
identify new methods of
scholarship.
8.
Keep in communication and continue to cooperate and coordinate with OUR
(Office of
Undergraduate Research), CCEL Center for Community Engaged Learning, Hall family, and ARCC
(Academic
Resources and Computing Committee).
9.
Continue to coordinate with OUR to provide faculty with funding for
research assistants.
SBBFP –
Salary, Benefits, Budget and Fiscal Planning Charges 2013-14 –
Draft
1. Examine salary options for
compensation increases and prioritize recommendations.
(Spring)
2. Examine the dollar amounts
of equity and merit adjustments each year.
(Spring)
3. Review campus salary levels
using CUPA data, turnover data, and data from regional peer institutions.
(Spring)
4. Assess the current state of
compression and inversion within departments across campus in light of recent
hires and changes in salary increases for promotions.
(Fall)
5. Explore and make
recommendations on overload teaching and reassigned time.
Are they mutually exclusive?
(Fall)
TLA –
Teaching Learning and Assessment Charges 2013-14 –
Draft
1.
Continue to sponsor and promote book discussion groups for fall and
spring semesters
2.
Continue to sponsor the Faculty Forum along with the Last Lecture during
the fall semester (October 2013)
3.
Continue sponsoring the annual New Faculty Retreat each August
4.
Continue to sponsor the annual Adjunct Faculty Retreat (Nov. 9, 2013)
5.
Co-sponsor the Teaching with Technology – a Professional Development
Program with Continuing Education that will change themes annually;
Flipped Classrooms and Blended Learning for this Spring
2014.
6.
Sponsor brown bags on topics related to pedagogy weekly during the fall
and spring semesters in the Library, Hetzel Hollein Room
7.
Sponsor a Summer Learning Series, providing professional development
throughout the summer semester to
faculty on a range of topics (began Summer 2013).
8.
Sponsor professional learning groups for any group of faculty wanting to
meet with common interests (Ongoing)
9.
Continue to support and maintain the digital technology library,
specifically podcasts of training and workshops
sponsored by the Teaching and Learning Forum (Ongoing)
10.
Co-sponsor ePublishing
session during the spring 2014 semester to assist faculty with creating and
publishing educational materials.
This may involve a small group of faculty with the goal of
continuing in the following years
(Summer 2014)
11.
TEDxWeberStateUniversity cosponsored by CE and TLF (Feb 2014).
12
Sponsor graduate student fellowship for one master student during their
second year to help with various TLA
events, building and maintaining the digital library, and to help faculty
interested in pedagogical research across disciplines. A stipend is provided
(All year)
13.
Continue to support faculty through technology and conference equipment
check out (Ongoing)
14.
Fostering scholarship and publications based on teaching and assessment
work. Lectures and meetings building on TLF’s past research initiatives to
publish the vast amounts of collected data and
build faculty collaborations across campus.
7.
Other Items
-
Executive
Committee to be introduced at Faculty Senate in September.
-
Selection of a
Parliamentarian for Senate Meetings to keep the Robert Rules of Order. Ryan Pace
was chosen to be asked to serve as parliamentarian.
Jim Turner was asked to see
if Ryan is available to do this during Faculty Senate.
The draft charges will be reviewed again and
discussed at the September 12 meeting.
Lunch was served.
The meeting adjourned at 1:25 pm.