Faculty Senate
AGENDA
September 18, 2008
1. Roll Call
2. Approve the minutes from the April 17, 2008 meeting
3. Student Members of the Faculty Senate
Michelle Johnson, Tyler Lathem, Dan
Schwab, Victoria Thompson
4. Welcome
Bret Ellis, Vice President for
Information Technology
Yas Simonian, Dean of the Dumke
College of Health Professions
Ryan Thomas, Associate Provost
5. Research, Scholarship & Professional Growth
Committee – Therese Grijalva, Chair 2007-08
Spring 2008 Awards
6. Committee Membership Changes
Appointment, Promotion, Academic
Freedom & Tenure - Cori Tadehara replaces Cath Stilwell
Constitutional Review, Apportionment
& Organization - Shaun Jackson replaces Kathy Payne
Environmental Issues Ad Hoc Committee
- Larry Clarkson replaces Mark Biddle
Faculty Board of Review - Brooke
Arkush replaces Yas Simonian
Teaching, Learning & Assessment -
Leigh Shaw replaces Autumn Behringer
7. Approval of Committee Charges for 2008-09
8. Academic Calendar - Mike Vaughan
Next Meeting: October 16, 2008
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
MINUTES
MEMBERS - Listed Alphabetically
Mark Baugh Laine Berghout Shannon Butler Matt Choberka Hal Crimmel Ken Cuddeback Dick Dahlkemper Larry Dooley Eric Ewert Dave Ferro Lewis Gale Janelle Gardner Colleen Garside Azenett, Garza Doris Geide-Stevenson Afshin Ghoreishi Richard Greene Jeff Grunow Bruce Handley Rod Hansen Kami Hanson Laird Hartman Michael Hernandez Valerie Herzog Warren Hill - Admin. Joan Hubbard Michelle Johnson - Student John Kelly Wade Kotter Tyler Latham - Student
|
Becky Jo McShane - Cheryl
Hansen representing President Millner - Admin. Madonne Miner - Catherine Zublin representing Dale Ostlie - Admin. Ryan Pace Thom Priest Jack Rasmussen - Admin. - Excused Rob Reynolds Richard Sadler - Admin. Peggy Saunders Paul Schvaneveldt - Excused Dan Schwab -Student Cori Segovia-Tadehara Gene Sessions Yas Simonian - Ken Johnson representing Kathleen Sitzman Rick Sline John Sohl Ryan Thomas - Excused Victoria Thompson - Student Michael Vaughan - Admin. Barbara Wachocki Jeff Ward Jim Wilson Jan Winniford Bill Zundell - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Kay Brown, Secretary |
1. ROLL
2. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
Motion: Moved to approve the minutes from the April 17, 2008 meeting.
Made: Warren Hill
Second: Rick Sline
Outcome: The minutes were approved.
3. ANNOUNCEMENTS
4. INTRODUCTION OF STUDENT MEMBERS
Michelle Johnson, Tyler Lathem, Dan Schqwab and Victoria Thompson were introduced to the Senate.
5. WELCOME
6. RESEARCH, SCHOLARSHIP & PROFESSIONAL GROWTH COMMITTEE
Therese Grijalva, Chair 2007-08 reporting
During the Spring 2008 term, the committee issued two RFPs. The first requested Hemingway Faculty Excellence and Collaborative proposals, and the second requested proposals for research, instructional improvement, Hemingway New Faculty and Hemingway Vitality Grants. Unfortunately, the first RFP resulted in one proposal. As such, the committee extended the deadline to correspond with the second RFP (March 19). On March 19th, the committee received 49 proposals, 18 of which were Hemingway Faculty Excellence (HE) and Hemingway Collaborative (HC) proposals. The 18 HE and HC proposals totaled $156,038.62. The remaining 31 proposals totaled $53,191.56. The RSPG committee received $4000 from OUR to be used for student assistants. Details of the awards are presented below.
HE and HC: Awarded $59,729 out of a possible $59,729.
Colleges Represented
Hemingway New Faculty: Awarded $13,075 out of a possible $15,000.
Hemingway Vitality: Awarded $8,504 out of a possible $8,504.
OUR: Awarded $2,604 out of a possible $4,000.
Colleges represented:
Motion by the Research, Scholarship & Professional Growth Committee for the
Senate to approve the report of the Research, Scholarship & Professional Growth
Committee.
Outcome: The motion passed unanimously
7. COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP CHANGES
Motion: Moved to approve the membership changes stated above.
Made: Bruce Handley
Second: John Sohl
Outcome: The motion passed unanimously.
8. COMMITTEE CHARGES FOR 2008-09
ACADEMIC RESOURCES AND COMPUTING
PPM 1-13, Article 5, Section 4.1: The Committee on Academic Resources and Computing shall recommend policies and operational procedures on the acquisition and utilization of computers and academic resource material.
1. Allocate ARCC resources, including Dee Family Technology Grant funds, using consistent, objective, fair, and responsible criteria.
A. Review funding criteria and procedures for ARCC for possible revision or clarification purposes.
B. Continue to develop funding criteria for and advertisement of the Dee Family Technology Grant.
2. Assess faculty and student computer needs, solicit faculty input, and lobby for the faculty’s computer-related interests.
3. Review (with computing support) standards and policies for hardware and software purchases.
4. Continue to improve the means of submitting proposals and decreasing the amount of paperwork involved.
5. Monitor the expenditures of all ARCC funds, including those supported through WSUSA funding.
6. Maintain close communication with other computer resource entities on campus, including CE and IT online instruction.
7. Be represented on the IT Council and IT Steering Committee, and routinely invite directors to summarize status of new projects and ongoing IT/CE support.
8. Coordinate faculty representation on other IT related committees.
9. Improve communication between faculty, IT/CE, administration regarding technology issues and advise said bodies of faculty needs.
10. Sponsor a faculty/staff IT Users Group to share information, ideas, and solutions regarding the use of technology at Weber State.
11. Continue to function as a nexus of information regarding IT issues between faculty, staff, and students, acting in an advisory capacity, and investigate its position as a decision making body.
ADMISSIONS, STANDARDS AND STUDENT AFFAIRS
PPM 1-13, Article 5, Section 4.2: The Admissions, Standards and Student Affairs Committee shall be concerned with standards for admission, retention and graduation from the University and policies pertaining to student affairs
1. Meet with the Vice President of Student Affairs to review any student affairs issues which may need to be addressed.
2. Receive a report from the Associate Provost about continuing evaluation on MAPP.
3. Review data on concurrent enrollment courses and make recommendations.
APPOINTMENT, PROMOTION, ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND TENURE
PPM 1-13, Article 5, Section 4.3: The committee on Appointment, Promotion, Academic Freedom and Tenure shall formulate policies and operational procedures on these matters and on due process and merit.
1. Determine the status of proposed changes to the intellectual property sections of the PPM that are currently under review by the University Counsel and make recommendations for policy changes in response to the results of that review.
2. Examine the language used in the PPM for Instructors, Instructor Specialists, and Visiting Professors, and recommend revisions of this language that may be required in order to eliminate inconsistencies.
3. Review the language in Section 8 of the PPM regarding consistency of language and policy.
4. Review the schedule for submission of materials and responses by the Faculty Board of Review and make a recommendation.
5. Review the current definition of tenure and make a recommendation.
CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW, APPORTIONMENT AND ORGANIZATION
PPM 1-13, Article 5, Section 4.4: The Committee on Constitutional Review, Apportionment and Organization shall review, update and preserve the integrity of the Constitution and Bylaws of the Weber State University faculty government. This Committee shall study ratios of college representation on the Senate and recommend procedures for electing its members. The Committee shall also be responsible for recommending policies on the organization and operational procedures of the University
1. Calculate apportionment for Faculty Senate representation using the Hamilton Method and present the apportionment figures to the Faculty Senate during Autumn Semester.
2. Research questions and make recommendations that are brought to the attention of the CRAO Committee.
CURRICULUM COMMITTEE
PPM 1-13, Article 5, Section 4.5: The Curriculum Committee (CC) shall study and evaluate the curriculum needs of the University by reviewing program, certificate, and course proposals (including courses proposed to fulfill specific General Education designations as defined in the CC manual), which have been approved by college curriculum committees or programs that report directly to the Office of Academic Affairs.
1. Review and approve curriculum and program proposals.
2. Continue to conduct workshops on an as-needed basis with college curriculum committee chairs to acquaint them with curriculum procedures.
3. Work with the General Education Improvement & Assessment Committee to review the strengths and weaknesses of the Diversity requirement.
4. Monitor the Faculty Senate paperless curriculum approval process and work with the Executive Committee to address problems and make improvements.
5. Align program proposal format and requirements for consistency with Board of Regent’s policies.
6. Develop in conjunction with the General Education Improvement & Assessment Committee General Education rubrics that lead to assessment of General Education courses.
7. Consider in conjunction with the General Education Improvement & Assessment Committee changes to the current university requirements for the bachelor of science degree.
ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES AD HOC COMMITTEE
1. Help facilitate the modeling of best practices for economic and environmental sustainability at WSU.2. Serve as a local and statewide source for scientifically-based information and for leadership on environmental issues affecting Utah and the Wasatch Front.
3. Help facilitate integration of environmental initiatives into academic affairs, student affairs, and facilities management.
4. Review status as a Faculty Senate committee and determine if steps should be taken for it to become a Standing Committee.
GENERAL EDUCATION IMPROVEMENT & ASSESSMENT
PPM 1-13, Article 5, Section 4.6: The General Education Committee (GE) shall articulate the mission and goals for the General Education program and University core requirements and review these on a regular basis. The General Education Committee shall define the standards for the General Education program and oversee the assessment of the General Education program and University core requirements.
1. Develop a plan to communicate mission statements and learning outcomes to faculty.
2. Sustain cross disciplinary faculty discussions of general education.
3. Analyze enrollment data and/or transcripts of recent graduates to identify those courses most often used to satisfy the breath requirements of general education. Summaries by college, as well as the university as a whole, should be produced.
4. Develop in conjunction with the Curriculum Committee General Education rubrics that lead to assessment of General Education courses.
5. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of the Diversity (DV) requirement. This assessment should include significant input from the Student Senate as this requirement was established at their request.
6. Explore promising initiatives including e-portfolios, disciplinary advising template, and linked courses including online courses.
7. Consider in conjunction with the Curriculum Committee changes to the current university requirements for the bachelor of science degree.
HONORARY DEGREE
PPM 1-13, Article 5, Section 4.6: Faculty members on the Honorary Degree Committee shall review the recommendations presented to them and shall act as the faculty representatives on the Committee on Commencement and Honorary Degrees.
1. Examine the differences between the December and May Commencements and recommend ways to make the events more uniform. Discuss the advisability of eliminating December Commencement as a possible solution to the problem.
2. Analyze data for May and December commencement including cost and attendance. Make recommendations.
3. Meet separately and early as the faculty portion of the committee to discuss representing in a unified manner the constituent needs and interests of the faculty in the deliberation of the larger committee.
4. Ensure faculty involvement in the nomination and selection of candidates for honorary degrees and for commencement speakers through maintaining the important voice of the faculty and the Faculty Senate as a major force on the institutional committee.
5. Consider ways to encourage more nominations from faculty for honorary degrees,
6. Encourage the selection of at least one honorary degree recipient each year who has made an outstanding academic contribution to higher education, preferably a WSU faculty member.
7. Work to achieve a representation of gender and ethnicity among degree recipients and ensure that all recipients are of stature to enhance the image of Weber State University.
8. See that the criteria for honorary degrees are considered , so that the understandable desire of the administration to cultivate donors and potential donors does not overwhelm the deliberations and pass over otherwise worthy candidates.
9. Provide the larger committee with a way to carry forward information so next year’s committee can benefit from work done this year.
RESEARCH, SCHOLARSHIP AND PROFESSIONAL GROWTH
PPM 1-13, Article 5, Section 4.7: The Committee on Research, Scholarship and Professional Growth shall recommend policies on research, scholarship, teaching loads, instructional and faculty development and faculty productivity. It shall facilitate faculty in obtaining grants, travel funds, physical facilities, etc., to collaborative research and scholarly activities.
1. Continue to issue requests for proposals (RFPs) for Research and Instructional Improvement grants, and Hemingway Vitality, Excellence and Collaborative awards, and review the proposals in a timely manner.
2. Continue to coordinate deadlines for submission of proposals with the chairs of the Institutional Review Board and the Animal Care and Use Committee.
3. Review and update as needed the proposal guidelines. Clarify and report the criteria for awarding the grant. Explore ways to simplify the process and broaden the criteria.
4. Provide feedback to authors why proposals were not funded.
5. Continue efforts to publicize the committee’s activities. Seek ways to broaden participation campus wide. Explore opportunities to disseminate information about the funded projects, including workshops, in order to provide consistent information and feedback to potential applicants.
6. Work with the Teaching, Learning and Assessment Committee to find non-monetary ways to promote and recognize faculty research and scholarship.
7. Work with the Teaching, Learning and Assessment Committee to help faculty identify new methods of scholarship.
8. Look at the committee description and membership regulations listed in the Faculty Senate Bylaws, PPM 1-13, for possible revisions and updates.
9. Explore collaborative roles with other funding sources, i.e. CIC (Community Involvement Center), OUR (Office of Undergraduate Research), Hall family, ARCC (Academic Resources & Computing Committee).
SALARY, BENEFITS, BUDGET, AND FISCAL PLANNING
PPM 1-13, Article 5, Section 4.8: The Committee on Salary, Benefits, Budget and Fiscal planning shall study, evaluate and make recommendations on faculty salaries, benefits, budgets and fiscal planning issues.
This Committee shall not exceed nine members with representation from each organization unit. The Faculty Senate chair shall serve as the Executive Committee liaison. A subcommittee shall serve under the direction of this Committee and represent the faculty in salary and related negotiations with the University administration. No two members of this subcommittee shall be from the same organizational unit. This subcommittee shall consist of the Faculty Senate chair, the chair of the Committee on Salary, Benefits, Budget and Fiscal Planning and a third member nominated by the Committee and approved by the Faculty Senate.
1. Equity Adjustments and Merit - Look at dollar amounts each year.
2. Narrow the gap between online teaching and face to face teaching.
3. Review salary compression by rank using CUPA data, and make a recommendation.
4. Monitor implementation of the new sick and family leave policy for faculty.
5. Investigate broadening the definition of dependents in the faculty sick leave policy PPM 3-21a, A.
TEACHING, LEARNING AND ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE
PPM 1-13, Article B-5, Section 4.10: Committee on Teaching, Learning and Assessment The Committee on Teaching, Learning and Assessment endeavors to enhance the learning environment at Weber State University. When the opportunity and need arise, and as charged by the Executive Committee of the Faculty Senate, the Committee studies, evaluates, and makes recommendations on issues affecting the teaching environment and the assessment of student learning at Weber State University. It also advises the Chair of the Committee in his or her capacity, as the Director of the Teaching and Learning Forum and supports the activities of the Teaching and Learning Forum.
This committee shall have one faculty Representative from each organizational unit. The chair of the committee shall be selected from a pool of applicants by a selection committee appointed by the Executive Committee and comprised of members of the Executive Committee and the Committee on Teaching, Learning and Assessment. The Committee shall be recommended to the Senate by the Executive Committee. The chair will serve for a three-year term and will be evaluated annually by members of the Committee on Teaching. Learning and Assessment. The chair of the committee shall be responsible for the day-to-day operations of the Forum on Teaching and Learning.
1. Continue to provide faculty development of teaching and learning through a range of established forums and opportunities yet to be created. These may include, but are not limited to the following:
Sponsor an Adjunct Retreat in conjunction with the Office of Academic Affairs;
Sponsor the Last Lecture Series in partnership with WSUSA;
Sponsor the annual Faculty forum in conjunction with Academic Affairs and RSPG;
Promote book discussion groups, workshops, retreats;
Assist the Office of Undergraduate Research (OUR) and the Community Involvement Center (CIC) in providing faculty awareness and development in these areas;
Sponsor the annual New Faculty Retreat;
Sponsor bi-monthly workshops for new faculty.
2. Explore ways to increase participation in all TLA sponsored events. 3. Talk about ways a database of faculty and community expertise, and those interested in sharing, in various aspects of teaching and learning could be compiled.
4. Continue to assess the effectiveness of established forums in serving faculty needs in teaching, learning, and assessment.
5. Develop, monitor, and assess a number of ways to promote faculty awareness, attendance, and support for TLA sponsored opportunities for professional development including monthly calendars of events.
6. Work with RS&PG Committee to find non-monetary ways to promote and recognize faculty scholarship and research.
7. Work with various campus entities (OUR, CIC, and the like) to help faculty identify new methods of scholarship.
8. Investigate the potential of moving the new faculty retreat closer and changing the number of days the retreat is held.
Pulled from the above list of charges were the charges to the General Education & Assessment Committee, and the Salary, Benefits, Budget & Fiscal Planning Committee.
Motion by the
Executive Committee to approve the charges to the Academic Resources & Computing
Committee, the Admissions, Standards & Student Affairs Committee, the
Appointment, Promotion, Academic Freedom & Tenure Committee, the Constitutional
Review, Apportionment & Organization Committee, the Curriculum Committee, the
Environmental Issues Ad Hoc Committee, the Honorary Degree Committee, the Research, Scholarship &
Professional Growth Committee and the Teaching, Learning & Assessment Committee.
Outcome: The motion passed unanimously.
GENERAL EDUCATION IMPROVEMENT & ASSESSMENT
PPM 1-13, Article 5, Section 4.6: The General Education Committee (GE) shall articulate the mission and goals for the General Education program and University core requirements and review these on a regular basis. The General Education Committee shall define the standards for the General Education program and oversee the assessment of the General Education program and University core requirements.
1. Develop a plan to communicate mission statements and learning outcomes to faculty.
2. Sustain cross disciplinary faculty discussions of general education.
3. Analyze enrollment data and/or transcripts of recent graduates to identify those courses most often used to satisfy the breath requirements of general education. Summaries by college, as well as the university as a whole, should be produced.
4. Develop in conjunction with the Curriculum Committee General Education rubrics that lead to assessment of General Education courses. Consider a sunset rule for courses to undergo periodic review.
5. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of the Diversity (DV) requirement. This assessment should include significant input from the Student Senate as this requirement was established at their request.
6. Explore promising initiatives including e-portfolios, disciplinary advising template, and linked courses including online courses.
7. Consider in conjunction with the Curriculum Committee changes to the current university requirements for the bachelor of science, and bachelor of arts degrees.
Motion: Moved to approve the addition to charge 4 as stated
above. This addition also applies to the Curriculum Committee.
Made: John Sohl
Second: Warren Hill
Outcome: The motion passed unanimously.
Motion: Moved to approve the above change to charge 7 as stated
above. This additional charge also applies to the Curriculum
Committee
Made: John Sohl
Second: Warren Hill
Outcome: The motion passed unanimously.
SALARY, BENEFITS, BUDGET, AND FISCAL PLANNING
PPM 1-13, Article 5, Section 4.8: The Committee on Salary, Benefits, Budget and Fiscal planning shall study, evaluate and make recommendations on faculty salaries, benefits, budgets and fiscal planning issues.
This Committee shall not exceed nine members with representation from each organization unit. The Faculty Senate chair shall serve as the Executive Committee liaison. A subcommittee shall serve under the direction of this Committee and represent the faculty in salary and related negotiations with the University administration. No two members of this subcommittee shall be from the same organizational unit. This subcommittee shall consist of the Faculty Senate chair, the chair of the Committee on Salary, Benefits, Budget and Fiscal Planning and a third member nominated by the Committee and approved by the Faculty Senate.
1. Equity Adjustments and Merit - Look at dollar amounts each year.
2. Narrow the gap between online teaching and face to face teaching.
3. Review salary compression by rank using CUPA data, and make a recommendation.
4. Monitor implementation of the new sick and family leave policy for faculty.
5. Investigate broadening the definition of dependents in the faculty sick leave policy PPM 3-21a, A.
6. Review salary increments given current faculty for completion of a degree in light of the level of the degree and the expectation of the job.
Motion: Add an additional charge to the Salary, Benefits, Budget
& Fiscal Planning Committee as stated above.
Made: Warren Hill
Second: Jeff Grunow
Outcome: The motion passed unanimously.
9. ACADEMIC CALENDAR
Mike Vaughan presenting -
We have been talking about a change in the academic calendar for several years. The survey last spring regarding the academic calendar came back mixed for support of a change to the calendar for Fall and Spring; 52% were in favor of a change, 48% were not in favor of a change, 9% of the faculty did not respond to the question.
The survey proposed the question of changing Summer Term for a calendar of two 7 week blocks with one 14 week block. The faculty survey indicated 57% in favor and 43% opposed with 9% not responding to the question. There is flexibility in these summer blocks allowing you to teach a four week course by starting a week or two later, or by ending early.
The Provost would like to move ahead with the summer calendar change and implement the 7 plus 7 with one 14 week block for summer term.
Elements left for the Fall and Spring Semester Calendar
With the present calendar you lose four days in the Fall (Labor Day, Fall Break, and the Thanksgiving holiday), and you lose seven days in the Spring (Martin Luther King Day, Presidents Day, and Spring Break).
Possible Options to the Calendar
Questions and Discussion by the Senate
ADJOURN
The meeting adjourned at 4:25 p.m.