Approved 1-15-09
Thursday
January 8, 2009
2:00 p.m.
MA 211K
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
PRESENT
Laine Berghout, Shannon Butler,
Dave Ferro, Colleen Garside, Kami Hanson, Bruce Handley,
Wade Kotter, Ann Millner, Peggy Saunders, Gene Sessions –
Kay Brown, Secretary
EXCUSED
Shannon Butler, Mike Vaughan
GUESTS
John Armstrong, Erika Daines, Rick
Ford
MINUTES
Peggy
Saunders: Moved to approve the minutes
from the November 20, 2008 meeting.
Second: Colleen
Garside
Outcome: The minutes
were approved.
GRADUATE PROGRAMS
Erika Daines, Chair of the
Curriculum Committee brought to the attention of the
Executive Committee the need for some guideline as they
review master degree program. The program come in various
varieties. The idea of setting up a sub-committed for
graduated programs to set some standards. The Executive
Committee decided to postpone the discussion until the
following week so that the Provost will be in attendance.
GENERAL EDUCATION
General Education Improvement
and & Assessment Committee – Rick Ford, Chair, rorting.
Priorities
Communicate Mission Statements and Learning Outcomes
Rubrics
Enrollment Data
Diversity
ARCC Academic Resources & Computing Committee – John Armstrong, Chair, reporting
John would like to report to the Faculty Senate in January to announce the Dee Family Technology Awards and in February to make a report on the action of the committee . He would like to see a significant increase in the number of proposals that are submitted for the Dee Family Technology Awards.
Ownership of the ARCC budget was discussed. Currently the budget is with Brett Ellis in IT. It was suggested that Mike Vaughan and Brett Ellis meet and discuss the ARCC budget.
The process for projects receiving funding from ARCC was reviewed. Once the funds are distributed ARCC steps out of the picture. Deans and Chairs need to work with Norm Tarbox and Facilities Management to see that the projects are scheduled and completed.
LIAISON REPORTS
Executive Committee members reported on the work
completed by their committee fall semester and what they
will be working on and completing spring semester.
SENATE MEMBERSHIP
An overview of continuing Senate members and
those going off the Senate was reviewed. Concern about so
many junior faculty running for a seat on the Senate was
expressed. Executive Committee members discussed ways to
encourage senior faculty to run for a position on the
Senate.
ADJOURN
The meeting adjourned at 3:40 p.m.