Course Name:
Fundamentals of Architectural Drafting Using CAD
Course Prefix: DGET
Course Number: 1360
Submitted by (Name & E-Mail):
Jeremy Farner, jfarner@weber.edu
Current Date:
11/16/2011
College: Applied Science & Technology
Department: Manf & Mech Eng Tech
From Term: Spring
2012
Substantive
delete
|
Current Course Subject
N/A
Current Course Number
|
DGET 1360. Fundamentals of Architectural Drafting Using CAD (5) F, S The
study of architectural working drawings. Covers procedures used in
developing a complete set of residential plans. Includes architectural
drafting standards, design procedures, and building code requirements.
CAD applications will be used in the development of architectural
documents.
New/Revised Course Information:
Course Title:
Abbreviated Course Title:
Credit Hours:
or if
variable hours:
to
Contact Hours: Lecture
Lab
Other
Repeat Information: Limit 0
Max Hrs 0
Grading Mode:
standard
Prerequisites/Co-requisites:
Course description (exactly
as it will appear in the catalog, including prerequisites):
Justification for the new course or for
changes to an existing course. (Note: Justification should emphasize
academic rationale for the change or new course. This is
particularly important for courses requesting upper-division status.)
INFORMATION PAGE
for substantive proposals only
1. Did this course receive unanimous approval
within the Department?
true
If not, what are the major concerns raised by
the opponents?
2. If this is a new course proposal, could you
achieve the desired results by revising an existing course within your
department or by requiring an existing course in another department?
3. How will the proposed course differ from
similar offerings by other departments? Comment on any subject overlap
between this course and topics generally taught by other departments,
even if no similar courses are currently offered by the other
departments. Explain any effects that this proposal will have on program
requirements or enrollments in other department. Please forward letters
(email communication is sufficient) from all departments that you have
identified above stating their support or opposition to the proposed
course.
4. Is this course required for
certification/accreditation of a program?
no
If so, a statement to that effect should appear
in the justification and supporting documents should accompany this
form.
5. For course proposals, e-mail a
syllabus to Faculty Senate which
should be sufficiently detailed that the committees can determine that
the course is at the appropriate level and matches the description.
There should be an indication of the amount and type of outside activity
required in the course (projects, research papers, homework, etc.).