|
1) How do collections of correspondence differ from
traditional history books? What do these first-hand accounts offer a
reader that third-person narratives cannot? How might historians
utilize them? What can future generations learn from these letters? 2) Many of the letters illustrate the disparity
between the true experiences of soldiers and the official
"news" being reported back home. Discuss letters which
debunked myths or refuted misinformation. Did you find any of them
eye-opening? Did any challenge your preconceived notions of what
transpired?
3) Although a few soldiers express doubts about God's
existence or benevolence, the vast majority seem to agree with Paul
Curtis: "My faith in God has been steadily growing stronger all
along. Without faith, I don't see how anyone could stand this."
Discuss the role of faith in American soldiers' lives. Are you surprised
their war experiences did not make more soldiers skeptical about their
faith? Why or why not?
4) In which batch of letters did soldiers express the
most confidence in the justness or worthiness of their cause? The most
pride, optimism, or selflessness? Which wars' letters reflect the most
shame, doubt or uncertainty on the part of its soldiers? Why?
5) What kinds of recurring themes, patterns, or values
did you discern in the letters? Are they all uniquely
"American"? What qualities or motifs might distinguish these
letters from those written by soldiers from other countries?
6) Did any of the letters make you cry? Which did you
find the most moving? The most unforgettable? Which soldier or other
correspondent did you find the most eloquent? The most courageous? The
wisest? |