Faculty Senate
MINUTES
March 23, 2006

MEMBERS - Listed Alphabetically
Ingrid Allen - Excused
Bill Allison
Lee Badger
Laine Berghout
Karen Brookens -Excused
Dilek Buchholz
Lloyd Burton
Tamara Chase
Bruce Christensen
Bill Clapp
Shelley Conroy - Admin.
Roger Crockett
Gary Dohrer
Dave Ferro
Rick Ford
Lauren Fowler
Kathy Frye
Lewis Gale
Dawn Gatherum - Excused
Richard Greene - Leah Murray representing
Frank Guliuzza - Parliamentarian
Susan Hafen
Bruce Handley
Sue Harley
Laird Hartman - Absent
Michelle Heward
Warren Hill - Admin.
Bob Hogge
Ron Holt
Joan Hubbard - Excused
Jim Hutchins
Becky Johns
Wade Kotter
Diane Leggett - Excused
Laura MacLeod
Marek Matyjasik
Jack Mayhew - Fran Butler representing
President Millner - Admin.
Mike Olpin
Dale Ostlie - Admin.
Ryan Pace - Salvador Martinez representing
June Phillips Admin.
Jack Rasmussen - Admin.
Chris Russell - Student
Richard Sadler - Admin.
Paul Schvaneveldt - Excused
Gene Sessions
Ryan Starks - Student
Kathleen Stevenson
Jeff Stokes
Michael Vaughan - Admin.
Toni Weight, Admin.
James West - Student
Jessica Wozab - Student
Scott Wright
Yu-Jane Yang
Bill Zundel

2006-07 Senators
Shannon Butler
Hal Crimmel
Larry Dooley
Richard Greene - Leah Murray representing
Jeff Grunow - Absent
Kami Hanson
Wade Kotter
Kim Hyatt
Becky Jo McShane
Rob Reynolds
John Sohl - Absent
Barbara Wachocki
Jim Wilson

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Kay Brown, Secretary

 

1.    ROLL CALL

 

2.    APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES

Motion: Moved to approve the minutes from the February 17, 2006 meeting.
Made: Warren Hill
Second: Wade Kotter
Outcome: The minutes were approved.

3.    Bruce Handley, Faculty Senate Chair, welcomed Jan Winniford, Vice President of Student Affairs, to the Faculty Senate.

4. Memorial Tributes - The Executive Committee and Administration have been discussing memorials for deceased faculty and the best forum for those tributes. It is their feeling that these should be given in a venue of the general faculty and not limited to members of the Senate.

5.    ELECTION OF FACULTY SENATE CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR FOR 2005-06

Gene Sessions, Vice Chair of the Faculty Senate, conducted the election of the Faculty Senate Chair for 2006-07.

Faculty Senate Chair Election - Shannon Butler, Tamara Chase, Dave Ferro, Wade Kotter, Gene Sessions and Jim Wilson withdrew their names from the election. The remaining names on the ballot were: Bruce Handley, Ron Holt and Jack Mayhew. Bruce Handley was elected Chair of the Faculty Senate for 2006-07. Election tellers were Gary Dohrer, Becky Johns, and Lauren Fowler.

Bruce Handley, Chair of the Faculty Senate, conducted the election of the Faculty Senate Vice Chair for 2006-07.

Faculty Senate Vice Chair Election - Dave Ferro and Bruce Handley removed their names from the ballot. The remaining names on the ballot were: Shannon Butler, Tamara Chase, Ron Holt, Wade Kotter, Jack Mayhew, Gene Sessions, and Jim Wilson. Gene Sessions was elected Vice Chair of the Faculty Senate for 2006-07. Election tellers were Gary Dohrer, Becky Johns, and Lauren Fowler.

6.   CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW, APPORTIONMENT, AND ORGANIZATION COMMITTEE – Tony Allred, Chair

First reading of PPM 1-13, Article B-V, 4.9 Committee on Teaching, Learning and Assessment.

" . . . The Committee shall be recommended to the Senate by the Executive Committee. The chair will serve for a two three-year term and will be evaluated annually by members of the Committee on Teaching, Learning and Assessment. The chair of the committee shall be responsible for the day-to-day operations of the Forum on Teaching and Learning.

Second reading of PPM 1-13, Article B-II Election of Members of the Faculty Senate

Section 7. Report of Election Procedures Results

7.1 Results of the election of new members of the Senate shall be reported officially to the chair of the Senate by the organizational units no later than the eighth week of the spring semester.

 

Section 8. Election of Executive Committee

7.2 Prior to the eleventh week of spring semester, the Faculty Senate Office will email and mail a sample ballot to all full time faculty. Executive Committee shall call a general faculty meeting for the purpose of electing members of the Executive Committee for the following year. The following week the official ballot will be emailed to faculty listed in the apportionment document approved by the Faculty Senate. Faculty will have three days to either email the ballot or hand deliver the ballot to the Senate Office. The procedure to insure the secrecy of the vote will be outlined in the memo and sample ballot announcing the election.

The faculty must vote for nine members; and in the case of a tie for the ninth member, it shall be decided by the flip of a coin. A secret ballot shall be used. The highest vote recipient from each academic college shall serve as an elected member of the Executive Committee. The next two highest vote recipients shall also be elected to the Executive Committee; however, no more than two members from the same organizational unit shall serve on the Executive Committee at the same time; for this purpose, a top-vote recipient will be eliminated in favor of the next highest vote recipient from another organizational unit.

Section 9. Newly Elected Senators Terms

Section 8. 10. Vacancies

A declared vacancy for one year or less shall be filled according to the election procedures established by the faculty of the organizational unit . . .

The proposed changes stated above reflect what is currently taking place for election of Executive Committee members.

Motion by the CRAO Committee to approve the above changes to PPM 1-13, Article B-II Election of Members of the Faculty Senate
Outcome: The motion passed unanimously.

Second reading of PPM 1-13, Article B-V, 4.5 Committee on Curriculum and General Education and proposed 4.10 Committee on General Education Improvement and Assessment.

4.5 Committee on Curriculum & General Education

The Curriculum and General Education (CGE) Committee (CC) shall study and evaluate the curriculum needs of the University by reviewing program, certificate, and course proposals (including courses proposed to fulfill specific General Education designations as defined in the CGE CC manual), which have been approved by college curriculum committees or programs that report directly to the Office of Academic Affairs.

4.10 Committee on General Education Improvement and Assessment
The General Education Committee (GE) shall articulate the mission and goals for the General Education program and University core requirements, and review these on a regular basis.
The General Education Committee shall define the standards for the General Education program and oversee the assessment of the General Education program and University core requirements.

Motion by the CRAO Committee to approve the above changes to PPM 1-13, Article B-V, 4.5 Committee on Curriculum and proposed 4.10 Committee on General Education Improvement and Assessment.
Outcome: The motion passed unanimously.

7.     APPOINTMENT, PROMOTION, ACADEMIC FREEDOM & TENURE COMMITTEE – Doris Geide-Stevenson, Chair

The APAFT Committee met with Rich Hill and Frank Guliuzza to help with the wording of the policy. They also consulted with the University of Utah and Utah State University. Rather than calling it an Accommodation Policy, they have decided to call it a Conflict Resolution Policy (conflict between course content and the student’s core beliefs).

Part I - Conflict Resolution Policy - General Statement to be placed into PPM 4 (Academic Affairs)

The University recognizes that students’ core beliefs may make it difficult for some students to fulfill requirements of some courses or majors. In these cases the University will make reasonable efforts to help students reach their academic goals. This may not, however, always be possible. The University assumes no obligation to ensure that every student is able to complete every major.

Part II - PPM 9-5

5. A faculty member, At the beginning of a each course, faculty members, by means of the syllabi, should inform students of the general course content, of what is required, and of the criteria with which performance will be evaluated. informs students of the general content of the course, what is required of the students and the criteria upon which their performance will be evaluated. The general content of the course and the criteria for evaluating student performance should relate clearly to the legitimate academic purpose of the course. The faculty member shall hold all students responsible for meeting the course requirements criteria.

6. If there is a conflict between a student's core beliefs and the requirements or course content in a particular course, a student may request a resolution of such a conflict. The faculty member is not required to provide alternative requirements or modify the course content as long as the existing requirements and content have a reasonable relationship to the legitimate pedagogical goals of the course. However, the faculty member is required to grant such a resolution if denial of the request would be arbitrary and capricious or illegal. (See PPM 6-22, part IV.D.9)

Part III - Student Code - PPM 6-22

8. The right to competent academic instruction and advisement such that students may

q. Request a resolution of conflict between course content and the student’s core-beliefs. (See PPM 6-22 IV. D. 9)

PPM 6-22 IV. D. 9.

9. Determine, before the last day to drop courses without penalty, when course requirements conflict with the student’s sincerely-held core beliefs. If there is such a conflict, the student should consider dropping the class.  A student who finds this solution impracticable may request a resolution from the instructor. This policy does not oblige the instructor to grant the request, except in those cases when a denial would be arbitrary and capricious or illegal. This request must be made to the instructor in writing and the student must deliver a copy of the request to the office of the department head. The student’s request must articulate the burden the requirement would place on the student’s beliefs.

Faculty responsibility is to make it clear what the course content is in the syllabus. The course requirements should be linked to that content. The content should have a reasonable relationship to legitimate pedagogical goals of the course. If a student complains about the course requirements, the only reason a change would be required would be if the requirements were found to be arbitrary, capricious or illegal.

Motion from the APAFT Committee to approve the above Conflict Resolution Policy general statement to be placed in PPM 4, changes to PPM 9-5 and changes to PPM 6-22 as stated above.
Outcome: The motion passed unanimously.

8.    SALARY, BENEFITS, BUDGET & FISCAL PLANNING – Craig Oberg, Chair

Salary Increase Sources

Adjustments to Benefit Package

  1. Change in the ER copay from $65 to $100
  2. Copays Increases - Office copays from $15 to $20, Therapy from $20 to $25, and Urgent Care from $25 to $30
  3. Three-Tire Drug Program - Generic - 20% copay with a $5 minimum, Preferred - 25% copay with a $10 minimum, and Non-Preferred - 35% copay with a $20 minimum
  4. Change Drug Coinsurance Max from $1000 to $1250

Recommendations from Salary, Benefits, Budget & Fiscal Planning Committee 

Additional Funds from the Provost

9.    CURRICULUM & GENERAL EDUCATION COMMITTEE – Laine Berghout, Chair

Curriculum Proposals

Chemistry Department - Course proposal for Introduction to General, Organic & Biochemistry Lab

Criminal Justice - Course proposal for Scientific Crime Scene Investigation - CJ 2340

Political Science - Course proposals for Political Behavior - Pols 3620, Politics in Perspective - Pols 4870, and Internship Research - Pols 4880

History -Curse proposal for Religion in American History - Hist 3250

Athletic Training - Program proposal for Athletic Training Major
Course changes for Level I Clinical Experience - AT 2862 changing to Clinical Application of Athletic Training I - AT 1501,
Sports Injuries - AT 3530 changing to Prevention and Care of Musculoskeletal Injuries - AT 2430, Level II Clinical Experience - AT 3861 changing to Clinical Application of Athletic Training II - AT 2500, Level II Clinical Experience - AT 3862 changing to Clinical Application of Athletic Training III - AT 2501, Evaluation and Care of Athletic Injuries: Lower Extremity - AT 4300 changing to Evaluation and Care of Musculoskeletal Injuries: Lower Extremity - AT 3300, Evaluation and Care of Athletic Injuries: Upper Extremity - AT 4301 changing to Evaluation and Care of Musculoskeletal Injuries: Upper Extremity - AT 3301, Level III Clinical Experience - AT 4861 changing to Clinical Application of Athletic Training IV - AT 3500, Level III Evaluation and Care of Musculoskeletal Injuries: Upper Extremity - AT 3301, Level III Clinical Experience - AT 4861 changing to Clinical Application of Athletic Training IV - AT 3500, Level III Clinical Experience - AT 4862 changing to Clinical Application of Athletic Training V - AT 3501, Modalities of Athletic Injuries - AT 3571 changing to Basic Therapeutic Modalities for, Musculoskeletal Injuries - AT 4100, Level IV Professional Experience - AT 4960 changing to Clinical Application of Athletic, Training VI - AT 4500, Administration & Management for Human Performance Professions - AT 4600 changing to Administration & Management in Athletic Training - AT 4600

Course proposals for Introduction to Sports Medicine - AT 2175, Tapping, Bracing, Padding, and Splinting - AT 2431, Advanced Therapeutic Modalities for Musculoskeletal Injuries - AT 4101, Individual Projects - AT 4800, Preparation for the Board of Certification (BOC) Exam - AT 4998, Critical Thinking for Musculoskeletal Injury Management - AT 4999.

A question was raised about the Criminal Justice course, Scientific Crime Scene Investigation - CJ 2340, not having a lab connected to the course. This is one course in a series of courses for forensic scientists. The department feels the laboratory is more appropriate for students who want to pursue a degree in the forensic science program. However, for students in other criminal justice areas, particularly law enforcement, the information in this course would be valuable without the lab aspects. The Criminal Justice Department is in the process of revising the Criminal Justice program.

A question was raised about possible course overlap of the Religion in American History - Hist 3250 proposal. It was noted that the Sociology & Anthropology Department was contacted about the course content. The Sociology Department and Political Science Department responded to the proposed course indicating it would not be on conflict with courses taught in their departments.

Motion by the Curriculum & General Education Committee to approve the above curriculum proposals.
Outcome: The motion passed unanimously.

10. Updates

Mike Vaughan reporting -

President Millner reporting -

ADJOURN
The meeting adjourned at 4:30 p.m.