Dr. M. Diane Krantz English 3080
344 Social Sciences MWF 10-10:50; Spring 2006
Off. Hours: M 4 pm; T 10:-11; F 11, or by appointment. Phone 626-6543
dkrantz@weber.edu http://faculty.weber.edu/dkrantz

 

Text Course Description Course Goals
Grading Notices Weekly Schedule

Required Texts: A Practical Introduction to Literary Study Brown and Yarbrough
                           The Great Gatsby F. Scott Fitzgerald
                            A Doll's House Henrik Ibsen (online)
                            "Is There a Text in This Class?" Stanley Fish (ereserve)

Description: You will be introduced to the basic theories of and different approaches to literary criticism, which plays a central role in the study of literature. We will focus on several active reading strategies to help you learn to see literature from diverse perspectives and to appreciate the social and cultural impacts of creating and critiquing literary texts. You will practice and refine your writing according to literary conventions. Although the writing component is relatively heavy, there will be no midterm or final exams which should make the workload reasonable. As an English major, you are expected to read and reread descriptions and assignments carefully and correctly. Feel free to ask questions: they mark you as a serious scholar.

Course Goals:
1. You will be able to identify and explain several major theories and demonstrate that you can apply these critical approaches to literary texts.

2. You will be able to use the major terms/devices/conventions to read, speak about, and write about a number of literary genres.

3. You will show skill in finding, evaluating, and using research to produce critical papers.

4. You will demonstrate an understanding in your papers of conventions surrounding the interpretation and explication of texts.

5. You will demonstrate familiarity with and be able to document correctly using the MLA method.

Grading:
Short Papers 25%. These include a 2-page explication (7%) and two two-page summaries (9% each) of the critical theories. They are to exhibit the qualities that mark a proficient writer at a university. Consult these links for basic aids to writing.
Goals 1, 2, 4.

Discussion Leaders 5%. You must lead once to get this credit. I will begin discussions for week one and, subsequently, 2 of you will lead each week. You are to take one of the reading questions or an equally penetrating idea to discuss. goals 1, 2.

Participation 10%. The sole way to gain these points is to participate by being in class. You are allowed four absences for the semester without a penalty. Thereafter, no matter the reason, the participation grade drops for each day you miss. Ignoring attendance drops your highest possible grade to a "B." Goals 1, 2.

Weekly Logs (10 total for 3% each). These are to focus on the week's readings. They are to consist of 4 parts:
1. New vocabulary in the reading with definitions.
2. Close reading of a poem, a scene from a play, or section of a short story or novel with page numbers. This is a New Critical reading that aims at telling what literally is happening.
3. Response to the assigned reading. Here's a sample response with good and unacceptable pieces described.
4. Predictions as to what the characters will do next or how they'll live.
Logs are formal and focus on your own ideas about any one reading you have done.
Goals 1, 2, 4.

30% Long Paper This will be a researched paper of 10-12 pages (2500 word minimum for the body) that will apply one or two of the critical theories discussed to a single literary reading. If you choose to use a reading other than one we've done for class, you must have permission beforehand. Goals 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.

Omission of any one of the papers or of more that one log will result in an "E" for the course.

Students with Disabilities: Any student requiring accommodations or services due to a disability must contact Services for Students with disabilities (SSD) in room 181 of the Student Service Center. SSD can also arrange to provide course materials (including this syllabus) in alternative formats if necessary.

Ethics: Academic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to, cheating, plagiarism, collusion, falsification, accessing unauthorized course or test information, using unauthorized resources, or breaching copyright law. The penalty for such dishonesty will be an E in this course, and it may result in charges issued, hearings held, and/or sanctions imposed.


Weekly Schedule
Weekly units consist of the following:
* Reading explanations, theories, fiction, poems, plays from our books and from supplemental sources;
* Reading an electronic lecture, usually the summary of a primary article on a theory, for further information;
* Participation in discussion;
* Submitting a log every week when a paper is not due.

Readings are due the week for which they are listed. If a chapter refers to one of the readings in Part Six, you are expected to do that reading also. The log is due by Friday of the week for which the readings are given. Discussion leaders are to come with questions or observations for comment by Monday morning each week.

Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5
Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10
Week 11 Week 12 Week 13 Week 14 Week 15


Week 1
Introduction and Overview; Writing explications and analytical response papers
Majoring or minoring in English requires becoming a professional at both reading and writing. This week read the chapters in your book that pertain to reading. You will consider what makes a work worthy to be placed in the canon (the accepted body of literature used in the university), what questions have been asked about the canon (historically, but in recent years much more probingly), how to read literature like a professional, and how to respond to a poem.

Read Brown and Yarbrogh Chapters 1-5 Be sure to use the suggestions for reading actively.
Log Response to Joyce's "Araby." pp. 303-306.

Week 2
As you read The Great Gatsby over the next two weeks, use it as a "laboratory" for experimenting with and applying the different theories you are learning and the vocabulary you are building. Also, read the sample explication carefully.

Read Brown and Yarbrogh Chapters 6 & 8, 12. Begin reading The Great Gatsby (GG), pp. 1-102; "Oranges," pp. 320-21.
Suggestions for reading and analyzing poems. Link to reading guide questions for Gatsby.
Discussion: Explore the beginning of GG in terms of characters and setting. Note especially the relationships of Gatsby to Nick and to Daisy, as well as the class differences suggested by East and West, the two Eggs, and Ashes.
Log Response to "Oranges."
Explication assigned; sample explication

Week 3
Read the section on New Criticism keeping in mind that you have most probably used this form of analysis whenever you've written on a text. Then focus on how to write a highly structured, but challenging, critical piece–an explication. The explication is the result of reading like a New Critic whose focus is on the text "as an entirely self-contained art object that may be understood entirely from its own words, form, and patterns." Your explication will be of a poem like "Oranges" (for which New Criticism works best) or a page or two of Gatsby, and it may ignore the writer, the history, and the culture from which it springs. This will not, however, be an emotive response, but an intellectual understanding for which you argue. Check the sample explication (linked above) for a model.

Read Brown and Yarbrogh Chapter 9-11; New Criticism pp. 211-214
Discussion leader on New Criticism (perhaps applied to GG)
Log Responses on Gatsby


Week 4
This week apply New Criticism to explicating a poem. The draft workshop is mandatory. Before writing the final version of your explication, consider the weaknesses of the student samples given in your book. Use the comments provided on these examples to critique your own writing.

Read Brown and Yarbrogh Chapters 16-18
Lecture on New Criticism (link);
Discussion leader on New Criticism applied to GG
Draft Workshop Wednesday.
Explication due Friday

Week 5
Move from reading and explicating (a fairly simple response to a text) to more complex writing about literature. Much of the reading this week should be review. If you are good at writing papers, quickly skim the chapters on writing . One practical ability in both explicating and analyzing a text is summary. We'll practice objective summary in class as it is described in the link below for week 6.

Read Brown and Yarbrogh Chapters 14-15; Goblin Market (GM) pp 307-319; Read GG pp 103-end. Be sure to use the suggestions for reading actively.
Discussion leaders and GG or GM; Use any method you choose.
Log Response "Goblin Market"

Week6
Consider Reader Response Theory both as it is summarized on Brown, p. 219, and as it is described by Stanley Fish in his essay, "Is There a Text in This Class?" which is on e-reserve. Reader Response in your text is listed as a form of Psychological Criticism. It argues (against the New Critics) that a text is never read "in a vacuum." Although texts produce meaning only when read, and althought they are the result of interaction between reader and words, they are interpreted not by individuals but by what Fish calls "textual communities." Such communities compensate to a certain extent for how much our personal psychologies bias our readings. A Reader Response critic focuses on how different interpretive communities have thought about a text.

Read Brown p. 207-211 and 219; ; "Is There a Text in the Class?" on e-reserve; Some hints as you read Fish's essay.
Due Friday: Write a 2-page Summary of Fish's essay.
Discussion leaders and GG; Apply Reader-Response theory to the novel.

Week 7
This week you will be reading and applying Psychoanalytic Theory. This theory is influenced by the works of Sigmund Freud, but in its modern application, it is especially shaped by the work of Jacques Lacan. Freud's "Oedipus Complex" and Lacan's "mirror stage" are used to consider ways in which the unconscious gets revealed in texts. You might want to read the play "Oedipus Rex" for insights into Freudian claims about how a boy becomes a man. Beware, however, of applying pop psychology to texts you are using. Also beware of trying to psychoanalyze an author from that author's work of fiction. In preparation of reading drama, read chapters that apply to it.

Consider that psychoanalytic analysis is also done using the theories of C. G. Jung although many in the academic community look down on this. Nonetheless, Jung's archetypes and his "collective unconscious" are probably a fruitful way of studying "Goblin Market."

Read Brown and Yarbrogh Chapters 7, 13; pp. 214-219.
Lecture: Here's a link to a page of links for various theories, including a description of psychoanalytic theory. The link to Lacan should be very useful.
Discussion leaders: Apply Psychoanalytic Theory to "Goblin Market." For example: how might the girls represent the id and the superego of the speaker?

Log Response "The Yellow Wallpaper" pp. 272-84.

Week 8
In preparation for the second half of the course, begin reading on research methods and techniques. Also, apply what you have learned about reading drama to the play Trifles.

Read Brown Chapters 19 and 20; Trifles 285-94
Reading Guide: Trifles

Log responses to Trifles

Week 9
The difficult text will be that by Ellen Golub. However, your own attempt two weeks ago at "psychoanalyzing" Goblin Market should help you to see what Golub is doing. I suggest not reading the side commentary the first time through and then going back and rereading with the side comments.  These side comments are by your text authors and are not part of what Golub has to say. Note how Golub integrates her sources and gives quotations both from sources and from the poem.  Note also that the references do not outweigh Golub's own analysis. This piece can serve as a sophisticated model for your own paper. Finally, be aware that her format for her citations is not up-to-date and should not be used as a model for your citations.

Read Brown Chapter 26.
Discussion: How did your reading of "Goblin Market" compare to Golub's?
Log Response to "Hills Like White Elephants." pp 296-299.

Week 10
Read Brown Chapters 23 and 24; Writing the Research Paper; Using MLA format
Assignment of research paper.

No Log due this week, but email me about the text you will analyze for the final paper and one theory studied so far that you think you might apply to it. You may not use New Criticism. You may change your mind on the theory until the twelfth week of class.

Week 11
This week's theories are the most difficult of those we study. They rely on Jacques Derrida's notion that philosophical systems undermine themselves, partly by defining ideas as binary oppositions where one term is always assumed subordinate to the other. Derrida applied this undermining to opening literary texts. For thousands of years Western readers believed that the meaning of texts could be "nailed down." Derrida rejects this and opens the way to finding multiple meanings. Note that ths doesn't mean that a text can mean anything, but that different scholars can legitimately argue for different and contradictory meanings in the same text.

Read Brown and Yarbrogh pp. 220-226 and 300; Begin reading A Doll House (link). This link changes from time to time, but you'll have to download one of the versions given on the page. Reading Guide
Online descriptions of poststructuralism.

Write a 2-page summary of Deconstruction or Psychological Criticism as found in your text, due Friday. Be sure to include all the subsections of the text devoted to whichever theory you choose. The format is the same as for the first summary. If you choose to do your final paper using Deconstruction, you must read and summarize Derrida's "Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences."
Discussion leaders on Deconstruction

Week 12
New Historicism, Marxist theory, and Postcolonialism are often studied as major theories in themselves. Your book lumps them together under cultural studies. Think of New Historicism as focusing on history as a text itself, no more "objective" than a creative piece and just as limited by the culture that produces it. Marxism considers history and the texts produced in different periods as affected by class and economic structures in cultures. Foucault sees cultures as networks of power and all histories produced by cultures as subjective. Postcolonialists see oppressed peoples as trapped between, and never able to fully participate in, both the culture destroyed by colonizers and the culture of the colonizer. Such critics bring this knowledge to the texts produced by or about colonized people. Ibsen's play lends itself easily to a Marxist reading because one of its major themes is the impact of money (or its lack) on an upper-middle class marriage. Consider this as you read the play.

Read Brown and Yarbrogh pp. 234-243;
Online discussion of social/cultural theories

Discussion leaders on Cultural Studies and/or New Historicism
Log responses to A Doll House

Email me about the theory or theories you are definitely applying for the final paper.

Week 13
Now that you have studied most critical theories, note another example of using such theories to interpret Hemingway's short story. Also, consider which of the theories you've studied might be most useful to you in analyzing a particular text.

Brown and Yarbrough Chapters 21 and 22; pp 296-99; Continue reading A Doll House (link).
Log response on "The Negro Speaks of Rivers," (p. 300) using a theory you've learned.

Mandatory Draft Workshop on Friday.
Bring one or two copies of your final paper.

Week 14
The major reason for delaying Gender Criticism, including Feminism, until this week is that scholars using the theories here always use another literary theory also. British and American critics tend to be liberal activists, frequently involved with women's and gay rights movements. Liberal feminism is based historically on 18th-century political philosophy such as that of John Stuart Mill. French feminism is highly theoretical and more radical in its assumptions. It relies on Poststructuralist assumptions about language, especially that of the deconstructionists.

Read Brown and Yarbrogh pp. 226-234; Finish Reading A Doll House (link)
Online discussion of Gender theories
Discussion leaders on Gender Theory
Log Response
on the end of A Doll House
Submit Final Paper
complete with bibliography

Week 15
Presentations of final papers shortened to 12-15 minutes.