The tale was probably composed with its priestly narrator in mind. The material is homiletic and the method is highly appropriate to the teller: wily digressions on dreams, the advice on women, and ideas about predestination reveal a teller intimately acquainted with matters of intellectual interest.
NPT parallels and parodies the tales of the falls of great men. It contains a historical allusion to Jack Straw, a supposed leader of the Peasants' Revolt of 1381. A ruthless mob attacked a group of prosperous foreigners, the Flemings, who were involved in the wool trade. The peasants themselves were then harshly dealt with by the nobility.
Chaucer combines the fabular and the epic traditions. Beast epic is amoral
and fable always has a moral. The combination creates the dynamics of the
tale.
The central episode beginning with Chauntecleer's crowing to the sun in Taurus
and ending with the moralite, corresponds to the fable. The overall
frame including the dream, the hen, and the old farm woman belong to the beast
epic. Also, the hen's skepticism, her denunciation of fear and cowardice,
the debate on women's counsel, and the absurdedly inflated and expanded style
of narrative belong to the epic.
Critical debate: the extent to which the moralizations in the story are to
be taken seriously. Some critics interpret the story allegorically. One sees
it as an allegory of the Fall of Man, one sees it as a sermon on alertness
to moral obligation, with Chaunticleer representing the holy man and Daun
Russell the devil. Some see it as an allegory on the controversy between the
secular clergy and the friars, with Chaunticleer representing a priest in
a state of sloth or acedia and the fox as a friar who tricks him.
One critic sees the tale as a mock allegory
with Chaunticleer representing the (cocky) preacher who interprets scripture.
Many critics see the tale as serious in intent although, since fables were
controversial in the Middle Ages, especially as a means of preaching, one
suggests that Chaucer is ridiculing the rhetorical and poetic practices of
his day. There is general acceptance that the tale is a parody of the excesses
of rhetoric that included long digressions, anecdotes, morals, literary allusions,
and verbal extravagances.
Medieval theory of dreams:
There were two, possibly three types:
1) those arising from natural causes such as indigestion or from a remembrance
of the previous day's happenings;
2) those that took dreamers out of themselves and taught them a lesson;
3) those of prophetic significance, divinely inspired. Morning was a propitious
time for prophetic dreams.
Pertilote is a skeptic and sees Chaunticleer's dreams as rising from natural
sources only.
Miscellaneous Notes:
There was a common belief that the cock crowed on the hour and so knew astronomy. Medievals believed that the world was created at the vernal equinox.
Pertelote over-prescribes for Chaunticleer. The Cock was naturally hot and dry (choleric) and the herbs she recommends would create more heat and dryness. Taken together they would theoretically kill Chaunticleer.
Reminder of the predestination vs. free will argument.
Augustine of Hippo, a Doctor of the Church (354-430),
proposed the orthodox view. Free will is given to man by God to be used to
the extent God allows. The 12th century theologian Thomas Bradwardyn upheld
Augustine's view.
Boethius distinguishes simple and conditional
necessity. "Simple" is direct. All men are mortal (will, of necessity, die,
so their death is a known end.) The conditional necessity is inferential:
if you know someone is walking, they are necessarily walking, but they don't
lose the freedom to walk or not because of your knowledge. Boethius argues
that God's fore-knowledge is conditional; I.e. It is not a necessary cause
of human actions.